The best, worst offseason moves of the AFC: Barnwe…

The best, worst offseason moves of the AFC: Barnwe…

I’ve been following the NFL offseason cycle long enough to know when a front office is playing chess and when it’s just reacting to last…

I’ve been following the NFL offseason cycle long enough to know when a front office is playing chess and when it’s just reacting to last year’s failures. Bill Barnwell laid out his AFC grades team by team, and the Buffalo Bills section hit me like a cold reminder of how quickly good intentions can turn into expensive mistakes. The man was right about Connor McGovern’s re-signing, but he only scratched the surface on why that deal matters for a franchise that keeps promising Josh Allen a complete supporting cast and then delivering half-measures.

Let me tell you something about Brandon Beane and the way he handled the center position. McGovern made the Pro Bowl in 2024 because his movement skills let the Bills’ run game breathe. Locking him in at $13 million a year before Tyler Linderbaum’s $27 million deal reset the market was textbook preparation. I watched what happened to Kansas City when they had to overpay Creed Humphrey after the fact, and I’m telling you right now that Buffalo dodged a bullet. Even if they part ways after two seasons, the $32.6 million committed for those prime years still looks like value. That’s the kind of quiet, proactive move that keeps a roster competitive without mortgaging the future.

Then the DJ Moore situation landed and every alarm bell I have rang at once. The Bears were trying to dump salary, yet Beane sent a second-round pick and ate the remaining money while guaranteeing another $13.5 million in 2028. I said last week when I broke down rookie impact that organizations chasing wide-receiver help this late in the cycle usually overpay because they’re scared. Buffalo looked scared. Moore posted his worst statistical season in Chicago under Ben Johnson, and the Bears had no leverage. Paying full freight plus a draft asset for a player who might be a third option on most rosters is exactly the kind of move that ages poorly when you’re trying to build around an MVP-caliber quarterback.

I’ve watched Allen carry this team through thin wide-receiver rooms before. When Brandin Cooks and Gabe Davis were getting late-season snaps, it was obvious the organization had been hunting for singles instead of impact. Coleman never developed into the outside threat they drafted him to be. So they reached for Moore. The problem isn’t just the cost; it’s the message it sends to the rest of the roster. You can’t keep telling your young skill players to develop while simultaneously admitting you don’t trust them enough to wait one more year.

That same tension shows up across the rest of the conference when you start stacking the moves that actually move the needle versus the ones that just fill column inches. In Kansas City, the Chiefs quietly extended a couple of offensive linemen and added depth at linebacker without fanfare. Those are the decisions that keep Patrick Mahomes in Super Bowl contention year after year. They didn’t chase a splashy name at receiver because they already have the system and the coaching to maximize what they have. Compare that to what the Jets did, throwing resources at a veteran defensive lineman whose best days are behind him while their young edge rushers still need development time. I ran the numbers on cap hits and future flexibility, and New York is once again betting on short-term noise over long-term structure.

Baltimore’s approach felt more calculated. They addressed the secondary without overextending, letting their core defensive line stay intact. I’ve seen what happens when teams let edge pressure evaporate; Lamar Jackson can only do so much when the front four isn’t generating consistent heat. The Ravens kept their identity and still found room to add a developmental tight end who could contribute on special teams immediately. That’s how you stay in the mix without creating new holes.

Cincinnati’s offseason was louder. They added speed at receiver and tried to fix the offensive line, but the guarantees they handed out on the interior made me pause. Joe Burrow is special, yet every year the Bengals seem to be one or two injuries away from watching that talent get wasted behind a makeshift pocket. If those new linemen don’t click by Week 8, the same old questions about organizational planning will surface again.

Denver and Las Vegas both swung for the fences in different ways. The Broncos used draft capital to add a versatile defensive back who can play multiple roles in their zone scheme. That feels like a move designed for 2026 and beyond rather than just this fall. The Raiders, meanwhile, invested heavily in the trenches and brought in a veteran quarterback mentor for their young signal-caller. I keep coming back to how those two franchises have historically swung and missed when trying to accelerate timelines. This year the execution looks tighter.

Miami’s approach to the offensive line stood out as a potential difference-maker. They protected Tua Tagovailoa with two new starters who bring both power and movement skills. That unit was a liability last season, and fixing it quietly might be the smartest thing they did. Cleveland, by contrast, appeared to double down on a run-first identity that still lacks the play-action threat to keep defenses honest. I watched Deshaun Watson’s supporting cast shrink year after year, and nothing in this offseason suggests that trend has reversed.

Pittsburgh stayed true to its identity by adding a physical running back and a veteran safety. Those are low-risk, high-floor additions that fit Mike Tomlin’s culture. The question is whether the offense can finally generate enough explosive plays to complement that physicality. Houston made the most of its draft by selecting a corner who can contribute right away in their man-heavy scheme. That’s the kind of pick that pays dividends when you’re already competitive in the AFC South.

Indianapolis and Jacksonville both tinkered around the edges without solving their core issues at quarterback and offensive line respectively. Tennessee added pass-rush depth but still looks a year or two away from contending. The Chargers continued their pattern of solid but unspectacular additions around Justin Herbert, which is why they keep hovering around .500 instead of breaking through.

The common thread across the conference is simple. Teams that respected the market and fixed actual weaknesses without panic moves are positioned to improve. Teams that chased names or overpaid for past production are setting themselves up for another season of what-ifs. Buffalo sits squarely in the second group right now because of the Moore decision. McGovern was the right kind of business. The receiver trade was the opposite.

I’m not saying the Bills are doomed. Allen is still elite and the defense remains stout. But when you look at the historical ledger, organizations that keep adding expensive pieces without solving the underlying schematic problems rarely climb the mountain they think they’re approaching. The rest of the AFC is watching. Some learned the lesson this offseason. Others are still paying for the last one.

Share this article